Keep the selected source
Retain the material you actually reviewed and the passages you cited.
Start from sources, not assumptions.
Keep the evidence with the finding.
Review selected source files, record findings and corrections, and keep their supporting passages together in local reports.

A real Pylotheke report using an invented example. The file changed outside the cited passage. A reviewer still decides what that means for the finding.
Open image at original sizeFollow a review
A finding is easier to revisit when its source, cited passage and corrections stay together. Explore the saved example to see the kind of record Pylotheke produces.
Retain the material you actually reviewed and the passages you cited.
Record a revised finding without losing the earlier version or its evidence.
Check what changed at the original citation locations. The reviewer decides what that means for the finding.
There is no public application download. You can inspect the saved report and ask about a review workflow; the software is in development.
No. It records selected evidence and comparison results. Interpreting those results remains the reviewer’s responsibility.
Citations are compared at their original byte positions. They are not automatically followed to a new location.
01 / PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT
Selected source files, cited passages, findings and their correction history, kept together in local reports.
02 / WHAT EXISTS NOW
An offline Linux command-line workflow in development. The project page shows a real report using an invented example. Not available for public use or download.
03 / SCOPE AND LIMITS
Checks compare the cited bytes at their original positions; moved text is not followed automatically. A reviewer decides whether the finding still holds. Source rights must be established separately, and distribution licensing remains unresolved.
WHO IT IS FOR